[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Ethics::
peer-review::
Indexing::
Article types::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal DOI

AWT IMAGE

..
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
..
:: Volume 15, Issue 6 (11-2013) ::
J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2013; Volume 15 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Intravenous Morphine with Morphine Sulfate Suppository in Control of Pain after Knee and Hip Arthroplasty
GH.R Khalili , SM Heidari * , M Sorani Heidari
Abstract:   (10273 Views)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A different forms of morphine (intravenous, oral, intramuscular) are used in control of pain after surgeries. Morphine Sulfate rectal suppository is a new form of this drug. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of morphine as two methods, intravenous morphine (Patient-Controlled Analgesia, PCA) and Morphine Sulfate rectal suppository in control of postoperative pain.
METHODS: In a double-blind controlled clinical trial, 60 patients (18-65 years old) undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups: A and B. Group A received intravenous morphine (PCA) while the second group received rectal morphine suppository (10mg). Pain intensity assessed by using visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal pain score. Data was collected using the questionnaire. The prepared questionnaire is used for evaluation of patient satisfaction (completely satisfied, satisfied, no comments, dissatisfied, completely dissatisfied). The number of nausea and vomiting, drowsiness and hamodynamic variables were also evaluated and compared.
FINDINGS: Mean of pain intensity after 24 hours in PCA group (1.50±0.97) in compared to morphine suppository group (1.57±1.33) was not significantly different. So in group A, 56.7% was completely satisfied in compared to 48.3% in group B (p=0.3). Nausea and vomiting occurred in 5 patients in group B (16.7%) but in group A any patient did not have nausea and vomiting (p=0.026).
CONCLUSION: In this study, postoperative pain was controlled similar in two groups. Although, postoperative nausea and vomiting was more common in suppository group.


Please cite this article as follows:

Khalili Gh R, Heidari SM, Sorani Heidari M. Comparison of Intravenous Morphine with Morphine Sulfate Suppository in Control of Pain after Knee and Hip Arthroplasty. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2013 15(6):19-24.
Keywords: Morphine, Postoperative pain, Arthroplasty, Analgesia.
Full-Text [PDF 365 kb]   (2423 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Biochemical
Accepted: 2014/06/7 | Published: 2014/06/7



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khalili G, Heidari S, Sorani Heidari M. Comparison of Intravenous Morphine with Morphine Sulfate Suppository in Control of Pain after Knee and Hip Arthroplasty. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2013; 15 (6) :19-24
URL: http://jbums.org/article-1-4580-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 15, Issue 6 (11-2013) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences

The Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657