[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Ethics::
peer-review::
Indexing::
Article types::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal DOI

AWT IMAGE

..
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
..
:: Volume 15, Issue 1 (1-2013) ::
J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2013; Volume 15 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of the Outcomes of Inguinal Hernia Repair with Mesh and Non-Mesh Methods
SR Modarres, * , AR Gholizadeh Pasha , A Gouran, , A Nourbaran, , SR Hashemi, , A.H Alijanpour , B Farhangi, , AA Drazi , N Nikbakhsh,
Abstract:   (22128 Views)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most prevalent procedures in general surgery. Several methods have been introduced for inguinal hernia repair that focus on the reduction of complications of surgery and lowering the recurrence of the hernia. However, controversies remain among surgeons about the preferred treatment method. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of repairing inguinal hernia with mesh and non-mesh methods.
METHODS: All patients aged 18 years old and over that admitted for inguinal hernioraphy in Shahid Behesti hospital in Babol during March to September 2010 included in the study. Demographic data, characteristics of hernia, duration of returning to daily activities and the type of repair of each patient entered in the checklist. All patients followed up for one year in case of any complication and recurrence of hernia. Recurrence of hernia due to ascites or due to any increase in abdominal pressure and missed patients during the follow up period was excluded from the study.
FINDINGS: Among all 132 cases 129 patients were male and 3 patients were female and the mean age of the patients was 53.66±16.89 years. Forty five (34.1%) patients underwent hernioraphy with mesh and 87 (65.9%) patients without mesh. The mean time for patients to return to daily activities was 25.4±4.7 days in the mesh group and 28.53±7.86 days in the non-mesh group (p=0.048). Rate of recurrence of hernia during the follow up period was 8 cases (6.1%) that 6 cases had been repaired with non-mesh method and 2 cases were repaired with mesh method (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Simple inguinal hernias seem to be repaired better with mesh method than non-mesh method.
Keywords: Inguinal hernia, Surgical mesh, Treatment outcome
Full-Text [PDF 207 kb]   (2886 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Biochemical
Accepted: 2014/06/7 | Published: 2014/06/7



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Modarres, S, Gholizadeh Pasha A, Gouran, A, Nourbaran, A, Hashemi, S, Alijanpour A, et al . Comparison of the Outcomes of Inguinal Hernia Repair with Mesh and Non-Mesh Methods. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2013; 15 (1) :12-17
URL: http://jbums.org/article-1-4289-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 15, Issue 1 (1-2013) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences

The Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660