[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Ethics::
peer-review::
Indexing::
Article types::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal DOI

AWT IMAGE

..
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
..
:: Volume 2, Issue 4 (10-2000) ::
J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2000; Volume 2 Back to browse issues page
Hemodynamic changes in patients with prophylactic Ephedrine before spinal anesthesia
E Alijan Pour * , M Rabiei , A Akbari
Abstract:   (9671 Views)
Objective: For several surgical procedures spinal anesthesia is preferred to general anesthesia. However some of its most important effects are reducing blood pressure (Hypotension) and heart rate. In this study, we evaluated the effect of prophylactic intramuscular ephedrine before spinal anesthesia. Methods: This study was conducted on 100 cases in ASA class I (American society of anesthesiologists) between 20-60 years old who had no co-existing disease. They were randomly divided into two groups (Each with 50 cases). The test group received 25mg (0.5ml) intramuscular ephedrine 10-15 minutes before spinal anesthesia and the subjects in control group received 5ml normal saline (0.9%) as placebo. After receiving 500ml Ringer’s solution, spinal anesthesia with 2cc lidocaine 5% was done. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure have been measured seven times before ephedrine and placebo injection, before spinal anesthesia and during the procedure at the 2nd, 5th, 15th, 30th and 45th minutes. Then data were rerecorded and compared. Findings: In this study, those who received prophylactic ephedrine had a raised heart rate and blood pressure before spinal anesthesia, but this rise was not more than 10% of the baseline and there was no need to treat their hypotension or reduced heart rate during anesthesia or the operation. But 28% of control group have received ephedrine for treatment of hypotension and 36% of them received atropine to manage bradycardia. After statistical analysis and comparing of these two groups, we have seen that the range of fall of heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the study group was narrower than that in control group and their differences were meaningful (P=0.000). Conclusion: The results show that the patients, who have received intramuscular ephedrine before spinal anesthesia, have a rather higher level of hemodynamic stability. Therefore, in patients for whom hemodynamic changes, specially a reduced blood pressure is dangerous such as those with a heart disease, old patients or those undergoing caesarean section using of this method could be useful.
Keywords: Spinal anesthesia, Ephedrine, Systolic blood pressure, Diastolic blood pressure, Heart rate
Full-Text [PDF 909 kb]   (1722 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Biochemical
Accepted: 2014/05/25 | Published: 2014/05/25


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alijan Pour E, Rabiei M, Akbari A. Hemodynamic changes in patients with prophylactic Ephedrine before spinal anesthesia. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2000; 2 (4) :7-11
URL: http://jbums.org/article-1-2888-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 2, Issue 4 (10-2000) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences

The Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660