[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Ethics::
peer-review::
Indexing::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal DOI

AWT IMAGE

..
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
..
:: Volume 8, Issue 3 (6-2006) ::
J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2006; Volume 8 Back to browse issues page
Primary evaluation of microleakage of crowns made of two restorative materials with the use of two cements
SH Mehdi Zadeh * , V Soltan Karimi
Abstract:   (6368 Views)
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Microleakage has been considered as one of the important factors in a restoration longevity. According to the introduction of new materials (ceramics and reinforced composites) in fixed prosthodontics and the use of bonding techniques in cementation, microleakage of these materials with the use of two cements was evaluated in this study.
METHODS: In this experimental study, forty human upper and lower premolar teeth were divided equally into two groups. Group1was allocated to ceramic restorative material (IPS Empress II) and group 2 was allocated to a reinforced composite restorative material (Targis & Vectris). In each group, samples were divided into two subgroups: ten were cemented with one resin cement (Variolink) and the others were cemented with (Dual) resin cement. After standard preparations for each material, relevant crowns were made and luted. After die penetration, the samples were sectioned and the extent of microleakage was assessed by reflective microscope and then the statistical analyses were performed (one way anova and t-test).
FINDINGS: The group assortments according to the least to the most were: group 2 (Ipse II – Variolink) (0.04670), group 1 (IPSE II-Dual) (0.4750), group 4 (T&V-Variolink) (0.5438) and group 3 (T&V-Dual) (0.7625). Of course there were no significant differences among groups. A comparison between two types of cements, types of restorative materials and types of teeth, showed no significant differences. The level of microleakage was very low (according to the score selected). In only four samples high values were noted. The maximum amount of microleakage was at the cement– dentin interface.
CONCLUSION: According to obtained results of this study, there was no significant difference among tested groups. It’s crucial for this study to be done with higher sample volume in order to define the best group.
Keywords: Microleakage, IPS empress 2 ceramic, Targis &amp, vectris, Variolink cement, Dual cement, Die penetration
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Biochemical
Accepted: 2014/06/1 | Published: 2014/06/1


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mehdi Zadeh S, Soltan Karimi V. Primary evaluation of microleakage of crowns made of two restorative materials with the use of two cements. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2006; 8 (3) :26-31
URL: http://jbums.org/article-1-2530-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 8, Issue 3 (6-2006) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences

The Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645