[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Ethics::
peer-review::
Indexing::
Article types::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal DOI

AWT IMAGE

..
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
..
:: Volume 26 - ::
J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2024; Volume 26 Back to browse issues page
Comparing the Effects of Lidocaine Spray versus Intravenous Lidocaine Administration after Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion
H Sorayae , Sh Seyfi * , P Amri Maleh , H Gholinia , A Ataie
2.Clinical Research Development Unite of Rouhani Hospital, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, I.R.Iran. , sh.seifi@mubabol.ac.ir
Abstract:   (423 Views)
Background and Objective: Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is commonly used in short-term surgical anesthesia. Intravenous lidocaine is used for better patient tolerance after LMA insertion. Regarding the side effects of intravenous lidocaine, the aim of this study is to compare the effect of lidocaine spray versus intravenous lidocaine on blood pressure, heart rate, sore throat, cough, laryngospasm, and other side effects including nausea, vomiting, and convulsions after LMA insertion.
Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 120 patients aged 18-65 years with indications for short-term elective eye surgery, in 2 equal groups of 60 people. The first group was given 1% intravenous lidocaine at the rate of 1.5 mg/kg, and the second group was administered with 5 puffs of 10% lidocaine spray in the throat. Then, blood pressure by a sphygmomanometer, heart rate by a heart rate monitoring system, sore throat intensity based on VAS criteria, and cough intensity based on mild, moderate and severe were measured and compared in the two groups.
Findings: 79 men (65.8%) and 41 women (42.2%) participated in this study. Clinically, there was no significant change in blood pressure in the two groups. The mean intensity of sore throat two and three hours after waking up in lidocaine spray group (0.51±1.33 and 0.41±1.07) compared to intravenous lidocaine (1.15±2.02 and 1.9±1.08) showed a significant decrease (p<0.05). Also, there were no significant changes in heart rate, cough and laryngospasm between the two groups. In addition, no cases of nausea, vomiting and seizures were found in the two groups.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, lidocaine spray can be suggested to reduce the severity of sore throat caused by LMA insertion.
Keywords: Hemodynamic Changes, Lidocaine Spray, Intravenous Lidocaine, Laryngeal Mask Airway, Sore Throat, Cough.
Full-Text [PDF 293 kb]   (75 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Interventional | Subject: Anesthesia
Received: 2023/05/8 | Accepted: 2023/07/26 | Published: 2024/05/20
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sorayae H, Seyfi S, Amri Maleh P, Gholinia H, Ataie A. Comparing the Effects of Lidocaine Spray versus Intravenous Lidocaine Administration after Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2024; 26
URL: http://jbums.org/article-1-11390-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 26 - Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences

The Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657