[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Ethics::
peer-review::
Indexing::
Article types::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal DOI

AWT IMAGE

..
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
..
:: Volume 27 - ::
J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2025; Volume 27 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of the Preventive Efficacy of Topical and Injectable Meropenem versus Cefotaxime in Preventing Wound Infection in Umbilical Hernia Repair
MHJ Al-Sa'adi * , MH Alebady , S Allawi Zayer
1.Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Misan, Misan, Iraq. , drmhj66@gmail.com
Abstract:   (1198 Views)
Background and Objective: Wound infection remains a troublesome problem that may complicate any surgical procedure. Prophylactic antibiotics are an important measure in reducing the rate of wound infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two different antibiotics (meropenem and cefotaxime) and different administration methods in preventing wound infection after umbilical hernia repair.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 321 patients who underwent umbilical hernia repair by primary closure or mesh repair. A prophylactic antibiotic was used in all patients. They were divided into three groups depending on the type of antibiotic used and the method of administration. Group I received a single intravenous dose of cefotaxime before the procedure. Group II received one dose of intravenous cefotaxime preoperatively and another dose of cefotaxime injected locally at the operative site, and Group III received one dose of intravenous meropenem preoperatively plus another dose of local injection. All patients were monitored for evidence of wound infection for 30 days.
Findings: Of the 321 patients studied, 243 were female and 78 were male. The overall wound infection rate was 7.7%. Group III (meropenem used) had the lowest wound infection rate (0.9%) and was significantly different from the other groups (15% in Group I and 7.5% in Group II) (p<0.05). Also, the length of stay in Group III (2.2 days) was shorter than Group II (1.5 days) and Group III (one day).
Conclusion: The results of the study showed that topical and systemic administration of antibiotics effectively reduces the risk of wound infection. However, combined topical and systemic administration of meropenem provides the best result in controlling wound infection.

 
Keywords: Umbilical Hernia, Infection, Antibiotics.
Full-Text [PDF 299 kb]   (148 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: surgery
Received: 2024/09/23 | Accepted: 2024/12/7 | Published: 2025/02/26
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Al-Sa'adi M, Alebady M, Allawi Zayer S. Comparison of the Preventive Efficacy of Topical and Injectable Meropenem versus Cefotaxime in Preventing Wound Infection in Umbilical Hernia Repair. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2025; 27
URL: http://jbums.org/article-1-12342-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 27 - Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences

The Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4713